Quadratic voting as an input to cost-benefit analysis

摘要

When agencies regulate, they must calculate the costs and benefits of their regulations. To do this, they must often price non-market goods-for instance, the value of protecting wildlife or the environment. Regulators have typically relied upon contingent valuation surveys to put prices on these types of goods. But contingent valuation surveys are fraught with error and often give rise to implausible valuations that cannot be trusted. Quadratic voting offers a better solution. Agencies should hold quadratic votes over nonmarket goods and use those votes to price the goods at issue.