首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >Are women more likely to throw the rascals out? The mobilizing effect of social service spending on female voters
【24h】

Are women more likely to throw the rascals out? The mobilizing effect of social service spending on female voters

机译:女性更有可能扔掉流氓吗?动员社会服务支出对女性选民的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study focuses on gender differences in voter reactions to a corruption scandal in one's preferred party. We analyze, in a framework of 'exit, voice and loyalty', whether women differ from men in terms of turnout (exit), and given that they vote, whether they prefer a clean alternative party (voice) or whether they continue to vote for their preferred party (loyalty) involved in a corruption scandal. We employ sequential logit models using data from the European Quality of Government Index (EQI) survey from 2017, which contains roughly 77,000 respondents from 21 EU countries and 185 regions. We find that women generally are less tolerant of corruption, but that the effect is highly conditional. In areas where social service spending is more widespread, we find that female respondents are more likely to vote for an alternative party. Yet the odds of exit increase among women when social service spending is lower.
机译:本研究侧重于选​​民对一个人首选党内腐败丑闻的反应性别差异。我们在“退出,语音和忠诚”的框架中分析,妇女是否与男性在投票率(退出)中不同,并且鉴于他们投票,无论他们更喜欢清洁替代方(语音)还是继续投票对于他们参与腐败丑闻的首选党(忠诚)。我们使用2017年从欧洲政府指数(EQI)调查质量的数据采用序贯Logit模型,其中包括21个欧盟国家和185个地区的大约77,000名受访者。我们发现女性一般不太容忍腐败,但效果是高度条件性的。在社会服务支出更广泛的地区,我们发现女性受访者更有可能投票给另类方面。然而,当社会服务支出较低时,妇女退出的几率增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号