首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >Trade and the predatory state: Ricardian exchange with armed competition for resources-a diagrammatic exposition
【24h】

Trade and the predatory state: Ricardian exchange with armed competition for resources-a diagrammatic exposition

机译:贸易与掠夺性国家:里卡德人与武装竞争争夺资源的图解说明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Armed conflicts-especially wars-between/among nation-states, considered as monolithic wholes, surely reduce the mutual benefit they enjoy from trade. That common sense is virtually self-evident. Wars destroy trust that is essential to trade, wars and preparations for war absorb resources otherwise available for productive investment and exchange. Wars destroy people, their capital, and land. Anticipation or fear of war distorts free exchange, causing nations to protect domestic production. Accordingly, I was surprised and puzzled, when attending a seminar by Professors Garfinkel and Syropoulos (Trading with the enemy, Memo of March 1, 2017, Department of Economics, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA) to learn of a rigorous mathematical model that entailed mixed motives in international systems that might lead at once to armed conflict among states which nevertheless simultaneously benefit from mutual trade. So here I develop a primitive Ricardian model to explore how incentives to trade interact with those of predation. Its primary purpose is heuristic: to assemble the components of Ricardo, present them in a manner that specifically incorporates opportunities for appropriation through armed conflict, and shows how the component working parts fit together. Importantly, the paper builds the simplest possible model for the case at hand. Methodologically, the steps are geometric/diagrammatic with only ancillary attention to mathematics. The aim is to construct and explore the simplest possible classical, old-fashioned model that could permit analysis of those trade-predation linkages that seem to permit so unexpected a conclusion.
机译:民族国家之间的武装冲突,特别是战争,被看作是一个整体,肯定会减少他们从贸易中获得的互利。这种常识实际上是不言而喻的。战争破坏了对贸易必不可少的信任,战争和战争准备吸收了原本可用于生产性投资和交换的资源。战争摧毁了人民,他们的首都和土地。对战争的预期或恐惧扭曲了自由交换,导致各国保护国内生产。因此,当我参加由Garfinkel和Syropoulos教授举办的研讨会(与敌人交易,备忘录,2017年3月1日,加利福尼亚大学欧文分校,加利福尼亚州欧文分校)时,我感到惊讶和困惑。这种模式在国际体系中产生了多种动机,可能会立即导致国家间的武装冲突,但同时也会从相互贸易中受益。因此,在这里,我开发了一个原始的Ricardian模型,以探索贸易激励与捕食激励之间的相互作用。它的主要目的是启发式:组装里卡多的组件,以特别结合武装冲突中挪用机会的方式展示它们,并展示组件的各个部分如何组合在一起。重要的是,本文为当前案例建立了最简单的模型。从方法上讲,这些步骤是几何/图解步骤,仅辅助数学。目的是构建和探索最简单的经典,老式模型,该模型可以分析那些似乎允许如此出乎意料的结论的贸易-掠夺联系。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Public choice》 |2020年第4期|459-494|共36页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Univ Calif Irvine Dept Econ Irvine CA 92697 USA|Univ Calif Irvine Ctr Global Peace & Conflict Studies Irvine CA 92697 USA|Univ Maryland Dept Econ College Pk MD 20742 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    International trade; Inter-state conflict; War; Resource-predation;

    机译:国际贸易;国家间冲突;战争;资源掠夺;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号