首页> 外文期刊>Public administration review >The Public-Private Distinction: Insights for Public Administration from the State Action Doctrine
【24h】

The Public-Private Distinction: Insights for Public Administration from the State Action Doctrine

机译:公私之间的区别:国家行动学说对公共行政的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Public administration scholars continue to grapple with how and why public organizations differ from private organizations. The judiciary deals with similar questions in ruling on constitutional claims that apply exclusively to state actors. The authors consider similarities and differences between scholarly and judicial approaches, adding to the body of research attempting to capture the complexities of the public-private distinction. The application in this article includes the coding of seminal court decisions and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to find combinations of causal conditions that lead to state action rulings. The specifics revealed through QCA provide valuable lessons for extending public norms and preserving constitutional protections when outsourcing public services.
机译:公共行政学者继续努力解决公共组织与私人组织之间的区别和原因。司法机关在裁定仅适用于国家行为者的宪法要求时也处理类似的问题。作者考虑了学术和司法方法之间的异同,这增加了试图抓住公私区分的复杂性的研究主体。本文中的应用程序包括开创性法院判决的编码和定性比较分析(QCA),以查找导致国家诉讼裁决的因果条件组合。通过QCA披露的细节为扩展公共规范和在外包公共服务时维护宪法保护提供了宝贵的经验教训。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Public administration review》 |2015年第1期|63-74|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis;

    Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:35:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号