首页> 外文期刊>Psychology, Health & Medicine >Different measures of risk perceptions and distress yield different patterns of results: The importance of specificity in measurement and theory
【24h】

Different measures of risk perceptions and distress yield different patterns of results: The importance of specificity in measurement and theory

机译:风险感知和困扰的不同度量产生不同的结果模式:度量和理论中特异性的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is little consensus on how to conceptualise and measure both cognitive perceptions of risks and affective responses to risks. We report data on two measures of risk perceptions and affective responses, as well as attendance behaviour, for 226 women who received a normal test result and 180 women who received a first or non-consecutive inadequate cervical smear test result. Different measures of risk perceptions (cognition) and distress about test result (affect) were not always strongly associated, often yielding markedly different patterns of results. This highlights the need for more precise reporting of measures and greater specificity of theoretical predictions. Suggestions for further studies investigating cognitive and affective reactions to health risk information are outlined.
机译:关于如何概念化和衡量对风险的认知以及对风险的情感反应,人们几乎没有共识。我们报告了226名接受正常测试结果的女性和180名接受首次或非连续性宫颈涂片测试结果不佳的女性的风险感知和情感反应以及出勤行为的两种测量数据。风险感知(认知)和测试结果困扰(影响)的不同度量方法并非总是紧密相关,通常会产生明显不同的结果模式。这突出了需要更精确地报告措施和提高理论预测的特异性的必要性。概述了进一步研究的建议,以调查对健康风险信息的认知和情感反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号