首页> 外文期刊>Psychological Review >Should Kohlberg's Cognitive Developmental Approach to Morality Be Replaced With a More Pragmatic Approach? Comment on Krebs and Denton (2005)
【24h】

Should Kohlberg's Cognitive Developmental Approach to Morality Be Replaced With a More Pragmatic Approach? Comment on Krebs and Denton (2005)

机译:柯尔伯格的道德认知发展方法是否应该被更务实的方法所取代?评论克雷布斯和登顿(2005)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Krebs and Denton (2005) proposed that Kohlberg's cognitive developmental approach to morality be replaced by a pragmatic approach more relevant to everyday social behavior and the cooperative moral orders of society. Although the Krebs and Denton article raises some legitimate questions, their proposal is at best premature and provokes some serious concerns. Their starting point, that Kohlberg's model of morality is inadequate, is an evaluation shared by many neo-Kohlbergians. Before the cognitive developmental approach is replaced, however, important contributions (e.g., Rest's schema interpretation of the stages) toward refining or improving the approach must be adequately considered. Evidence suggests that Krebs and Denton may have underestimated relations between moral judgment stages and social behavior, including sudden behavior in emergency situations.
机译:克雷布斯和丹顿(Krebs and Denton(2005))提出,用一种与日常社会行为和社会合作道德秩序更相关的务实方法代替科尔伯格对道德的认知发展方法。尽管Krebs和Denton的文章提出了一些合理的问题,但他们的提议充其量还为时过早,并引起了一些严重的关注。他们的出发点是科尔伯格的道德模式不足,这是许多新科尔伯格主义者的评价。但是,在替换认知发展方法之前,必须充分考虑对改进或改进方法的重要贡献(例如,Rest对阶段的模式解释)。有证据表明,克雷布斯和登顿可能低估了道德判断阶段与社会行为之间的关系,包括紧急情况下的突发行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号