首页> 外文期刊>Psychological Bulletin >Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)
【24h】

Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006)

机译:关联,提议或关联我们提出的建议:评论Gawronski和Bodenhausen(2006)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This commentary highlights the strengths of the associative-propositional evaluation model. It then describes problems in proposing a qualitative separation between propositional and associative processes. Propositional processes are instead described as associative. Propositions are ordered associations, whereas many other associations do not depend on the order of the involved elements. Implications of this alternative definition for the phenomenology of thought and for social psychology are discussed.
机译:本评论强调了关联命题评估模型的优势。然后,它描述了在命题过程和关联过程之间提出定性分离的问题。命题过程被描述为关联的。命题是有序的关联,而许多其他关联不依赖于所涉及元素的顺序。讨论了这种替代定义对思想现象学和社会心理学的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号