首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >Reflections on Janine Puget's Paper
【24h】

Reflections on Janine Puget's Paper

机译:对珍妮·普吉特论文的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In my discussion of Janine Puget's deeply thought-provoking paper, I focus on her central argument that the subject's interior world and the world of intersubjective relationships answer to different logics and evolve along separate developmental paths. Puget's argument hinges on a notion of the other, and of otherness as disruptive and traumatic to the subject. My discussion aims to problematize this notion on two fronts. First, I suggest that otherness is not only external to the subject. I point to some ways in which psychoanalysis conceives of otherness and of the other as integral to the constitution and development of the subject. Further, I argue that individuals sometimes desire and actively seek otherness. I engage in this context the question of social displacement and immigration, Puget's other main concern in her paper. Life tourists, as Puget calls them, are a paradox of will and necessity, where the prospect of confronting otherness and being othered is both a threat and a life-affirming recourse. Yet there seems to be more involved in immigration than the psychology of individuals or their relationships. Drawing on my personal and clinical experience as an immigrant working with other immigrants, I suggest that beyond the self-other relation, we can recognize otherness on a third dimension, that of collective, socio-political, normative discourse. Looking at the psychoanalytic notion of Oedipus, I suggest the possibility that Puget's view of the subjective and intersubjective as disparate captures the effect this third, social dimension of human life on the construction of subjectivity and of human relating. I argue that the fault line Puget recognizes may be understood as the effect, within subjectivity, of social power.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481881003604139
机译:在讨论珍妮·普吉特(Janine Puget)深刻的发人深省的论文时,我将重点放在她的主要论点上,即该主题的内部世界和主体间关系世界会回应不同的逻辑,并沿着不同的发展道路发展。普吉特的论点依赖于另一种观念,而另一种观念对主体具有破坏性和创伤性。我的讨论旨在从两个方面对这一概念进行质疑。首先,我建议“其他性”不仅是主题的外部。我指出了心理分析将异性和另一种视为主体构成和发展必不可少的一些方式。此外,我认为个人有时会渴望并积极寻求他人。在这种情况下,我将探讨社会流离失所和移民问题,这是普吉特论文中的另一个主要关注点。正如普吉特所说的,生活游客是意志和必要性的悖论,面对异性和被他人化的前景既是威胁,又是生命的追索者。然而,移民似乎比个人或亲戚的心理参与更多。根据我作为移民与其他移民一起工作的个人和临床经验,我建议,除了自我-他人关系之外,我们还可以认识到第三维度的其他性,即集体,社会政治,规范性话语。观察俄狄浦斯的精神分析概念,我认为普吉特对主观和主体间的看法是截然不同的,这可能抓住了人类生活的这第三种社会维度对主观性和人际关系建构的影响。我认为,皮吉特认识到的断层线可能被理解为是社会力量的主观性影响。查看全文下载全文,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10481881003604139

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号