首页> 外文期刊>Property Week >Regina (SM) v Lord Chancellor (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening)
【24h】

Regina (SM) v Lord Chancellor (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening)

机译:Regina(SM)V Lord Chancellor(移民被拘留者的保释人)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

1 Persons detained under Immigration Act powers in immigration removal centres ("IRCs") have access to legal advice under the Detained Duty Advice Scheme ("the DDAS"). The DDAS was established by the Lord Chancellor in exercise of his powers under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 ("LASPO"). Has the Lord Chancellor acted unlawfully by failing to make similar provision for those detained under Immigration Act powers who are held in prisons? The claimant in this claim contends that the lack of provision equivalent to the DDAS for Immigration Act detainees held in prison amounts to unlawful discrimination contrary to the requirements of article 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("ECHR") read together with articles 2,3,5 and 8.
机译:1人在移民法案下拘留的人在移民移除中心(“IRCS”)下有权根据“被拘留的义务建议计划”(“DDAS”)获得法律咨询。 DDA是由主校长建立的,他根据法律援助,判决和惩罚2012年罪犯(“Laspo”)行使他的权力。 主校长是否因未能为监狱举行的移民法案拘留的人进行类似的规定,使其非法作出相似的规定? 本索赔中的索赔人认为,缺乏对入境行为的DDA的规定涉及监狱的被拘留者的被拘留者违反“保护人权和基本自由(”ECHR“)第14条(”ECHR“)的规定相反的非法歧视 与2,3,5和8条一起阅读。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Property Week》 |2021年第30appa期|3815-3833|共19页
  • 作者

    Catherine May;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 03:04:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号