首页> 外文期刊>Property Management >The disposal of public sector sites by “development competition”
【24h】

The disposal of public sector sites by “development competition”

机译:通过“发展竞争”处置公共场所

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this research is to investigate development competitions in England in order to uncover any shortcomings and point to improvements. A “development competition” is a sale by tender of publicly-owned land with development potential where bidders also submit designs. Design/methodology/approach – First, an interview survey of local authorities in north-east England; second an interview survey with developers in north-east England; third a questionnaire survey of local authority estates officers and fourth an interview survey with London based property consultants. Findings – Despite their theoretical attractions, some competitions have problems. Conflict exists between professions and agencies. Development competitions encounter difficulties between developer appointment and construction which may lead to delay or the developer pulling out. Research limitations/implications – The data collected are biased in favour of the financial/property perspective. Further research is therefore still required. Practical implications – Despite its practical significance, no literature exists on this specific topic. The results reveal delays, disputes and sub-optimal use of resources. Further research is needed leading to new official guidance covering all aspects of this process. Originality/value – Large numbers of competitions are held in the UK each year. The disposal of sites in this way has become more significant due to the concentration of activity on brown-field land. In future, the need to assemble urban land using compulsory purchase powers is likely to make competitions more frequent. These results, which highlight best practice, will be of interest to all professional people involved.
机译:目的–这项研究的目的是调查英格兰的发展竞争,以发现任何不足并指出改进的地方。 “开发竞赛”是指通过招标出售具有发展潜力的公有土地,投标人也应提交设计。设计/方法/方法–首先,对英格兰东北部地方当局的访谈调查;第二次对英格兰东北部的开发商进行采访调查;第三是对地方政府房地产官员的问卷调查,第四是对伦敦房地产顾问的访谈。研究结果–尽管有理论上的吸引力,但某些比赛还是有问题。职业与机构之间存在冲突。开发竞赛在开发人员任命和施工之间遇到困难,这可能会导致延迟或开发人员退出。研究的局限性/意义–收集的数据偏向于财务/财产方面。因此,仍然需要进一步的研究。实际意义–尽管具有实际意义,但没有关于该特定主题的文献。结果显示出延误,纠纷和资源的非最佳使用。需要进一步研究,以得出涵盖该过程所有方面的新官方指南。原创性/价值–每年在英国举行大量比赛。由于活动集中在棕地上,以这种方式处理场地变得更加重要。将来,使用强制购买力来集结城市土地的需求可能会使竞争更加频繁。这些结果突出了最佳实践,所有相关专业人员都将对此感兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号