首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Nuclear Energy >Analyzing public preference and willingness to pay for spent nuclear fuel facilities in South Korea: A latent class approach
【24h】

Analyzing public preference and willingness to pay for spent nuclear fuel facilities in South Korea: A latent class approach

机译:分析韩国对核废燃料设施的公共偏好和支付意愿:一种潜在的类别方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Spent nuclear fuel tends to emit superheat and high levels of radiation, posing a serious threat to human beings and the natural environment, and, thus, warrants special treatments. However, most countries generating nuclear power are yet to achieve a public consensus on the construction and operation of spent nuclear fuel facilities. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed the heterogeneous preferences of the South Korean public regarding spent nuclear fuel facilities and estimated the public's marginal willingness to pay using a choice experiment survey and a latent class model. Then, using the estimation results, we simulated the rate of public acceptance with respect to the construction and operation of such facilities. The results revealed that public preference regarding spent nuclear fuel facilities is divided by two classes on the basis of two heterogeneous preference structures. In addition, we found that the majority of the public was expected to prefer a permanent repository, followed by temporary storages, and an interim storage. Finally, we also confirmed the validity of management options for spent nuclear fuel using a cost-benefit analysis and we concluded that the construction and operation of an interim storage or a permanent repository facility is not economically viable at this time. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:用完的核燃料往往会产生过热和高水平的辐射,对人类和自然环境构成严重威胁,因此需要采取特殊的处理措施。但是,大多数发电核能的国家尚未就乏核燃料设施的建设和运行达成公众共识。在这项研究中,我们定量分析了韩国公众对乏核燃料设施的异类偏好,并使用选择实验调查和潜在类别模型估算了公众的边际支付意愿。然后,使用估算结果,我们模拟了此类设施的建设和运营过程中的公众接受度。结果表明,基于两种异质性偏好结构,有关乏核燃料设施的公众偏好分为两类。此外,我们发现大多数公众都希望使用永久性存储库,然后是临时存储和临时存储。最后,我们还通过成本效益分析确认了核废料管理备选方案的有效性,并得出结论,目前临时存储或永久性储存设施的建设和运营在经济上不可行。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号