...
首页> 外文期刊>Professional safety >Confined Spaces Common Misconceptions & Errors in Complying With OSHA's Standard
【24h】

Confined Spaces Common Misconceptions & Errors in Complying With OSHA's Standard

机译:密闭空间常见的误解和错误,符合OSHA标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OSHA's permit-required confined space standard (PRCS) went into effect April 15, 1993. This standard (1910.146), arguably the second most difficult of OSHA's standards to comprehend, second only to recordkeeping (1904), likely is the hardest with which to comply. After 18 years, most employers, including many with sound safety systems, are still not in compliance, based on the author's experience. What makes compliance so difficult? What is it employers are not doing? As a safety consultant, the author has been an expert witness in confined space litigation. He also has conducted audits of clients' confined space systems throughout the U.S., and not a single audit has been without findings. This article shares some common findings sncountered to help employers improve their confined space systems. It also examines some misconceptions about the confined space standard. The following findings are presented in no particular order.
机译:OSHA的许可密闭空间标准(PRCS)于1993年4月15日生效。该标准(1910.146),可能是OSHA理解的第二难的标准,仅次于记录保存(1904),可能是最难于实施的标准。遵守。根据作者的经验,在18年之后,大多数雇主(包括许多拥有完善安全系统的雇主)仍未遵守规定。是什么使得合规如此困难?雇主没有做什么?作为安全顾问,作者是密闭空间诉讼的专家证人。他还对整个美国客户的密闭空间系统进行了审核,没有一次审核没有发现。本文分享了一些常见的发现,这些发现被sn绕以帮助雇主改善其密闭空间系统。它还检查了有关密闭空间标准的一些误解。以下发现未按特定顺序显示。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Professional safety》 |2011年第7期|p.42-46|共5页
  • 作者

    Bill Taylor;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号