...
首页> 外文期刊>Production and operations management >The Path-Dependent Nature of R&D Search: Implications for (and from) Competition
【24h】

The Path-Dependent Nature of R&D Search: Implications for (and from) Competition

机译:研发搜索的路径依赖性质:对竞争的(和来自)竞争的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We formalize R&D as a search process for technology improvements across different technological domains. Technology improvements from a specific domain draw upon a common knowledge base, and as such they share technological content. Moreover, different domains may rely on similar scientific principles, and therefore, knowledge about the technology improvements by one domain might be transferable to another. We analyze how such a technological relatedness shapes the direction of R&D search when knowledge generated from past search efforts disseminates to rival firms. We show that firms optimally diversify their search efforts, even toward domains that are riskier and less promising on expectation. This is amplified for higher competition intensity, i.e., higher cross-product substitutability. Our work also suggests that different sources of learning about the domains may have opposite effects on the direction of search. Higher ability to infer the potential of an explored domain prompts the clustering of searches, whereas the ability to learn across domains prompts diversification. Finally, we discuss the technological landscape properties that prompt firms to engage in a sequential R&D search, instead of a parallel competitive search.
机译:我们将研发正式化为跨技术领域的技术改进搜索过程。特定领域的技术改进基于共同的知识库,因此它们共享技术内容。此外,不同的领域可能依赖于相似的科学原理,因此,有关某个领域的技术改进的知识可能会转移到另一领域。当过去的搜索工作所产生的知识传播给竞争对手时,我们将分析这种技术相关性如何塑造R&D搜索的方向。我们表明,公司可以最佳地实现搜索工作的多元化,即使是朝着风险更大,期望值较低的领域发展。为了更高的竞争强度,即更高的交叉产品可替代性,将其放大。我们的工作还表明,有关领域的不同学习来源可能会对搜索方向产生相反的影响。较高的推断出所探索领域潜力的能力促使搜索集群,而跨领域学习的能力则促使多元化。最后,我们讨论了促使企业从事顺序R&D搜索而不是并行竞争搜索的技术格局属性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号