【24h】

Future challenges

机译:未来的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The central question addressed by the papers in this special feature lies at the core of the emerging science of sustainability. What is the decision-science needed to address sustainability issues, and how does it differ from existing decision-science? The answer is not at all obvious. Many, if not the majority, of decision scientists still take the view that sustainability changes nothing but the label placed on long-standing research questions. After all, the field of resource economics has focused on the sustainable use of renewable resources since the mid-1950s (1) and on sustainable development based on the extraction of nonrenewable resources since the mid-1970s (2). The basic insights that support both foci were developed even earlier (3), while concern over the sustainability of mineral extraction has been a recurrent theme since Jevons's 19th-century speculations on the coal question (4). Others argue, however, that we are seeing the beginning of a major change in the way the science of human use and impacts on the environment is being done. The focus on panaceas provides Ostrom and colleagues with a hook to explore these arguments.
机译:论文在这个特殊功能中解决的中心问题是新兴的可持续性科学的核心。解决可持续性问题所需的决策科学是什么,它与现有决策科学有何不同?答案一点也不明显。许多决策科学家(即使不是大多数)仍然认为,可持续性只会改变长期存在的研究问题上的标签。毕竟,自1950年代中期以来(1),资源经济学领域一直侧重于可再生资源的可持续利用,而自1970年代中期以来,基于不可采资源的开采(2)一直致力于可持续发展。支持这两个焦点的基本见解在更早的时候就已经出现了(3),而自从19世纪杰文斯对煤炭问题的猜测(4)以来,人们就一直关注矿产开采的可持续性。但是,其他人则认为,人类使用科学及其对环境的影响的方式正在发生重大变化。对灵丹妙药的关注为奥斯特罗姆及其同事提供了探索这些论点的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号