...
首页> 外文期刊>Problems of Economic Transition >Effects on Beneficiaries of the 'Monetization' of Privileges in Russia: Initial Experience in Saratov Oblast
【24h】

Effects on Beneficiaries of the 'Monetization' of Privileges in Russia: Initial Experience in Saratov Oblast

机译:俄罗斯特权“货币化”对受益人的影响:萨拉托夫州的初步经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In January 2005, Russia implemented a major overhaul of its social assistance system. The principal hallmark was the cashing out or monetization of some benefits previously provided on an in-kind basis. Using household survey data, this article measures the social and economic effects of the monetization of transportation privileges in the Saratov region and analyzes the attitude of citizen categories now receiving privileges to the further transformation of their privileges into cash benefits in the future. With respect to the types of beneficiaries that fared relatively better and worse through the reforms as measured by changes in consumption, local travel, and perceived changes in their standard of living, the clearest finding is that rural beneficiaries fared better than their urban counterparts. This was expected because monetization was rnimplemented for transportation benefits that are used primarily by urban residents. With respect to outcomes by income class, there is a broad pattern of beneficiaries in households with lower economic resources faring less well, although the overall effects are not large. Beneficiaries' responses to questions about further monetization of specific benefits overwhelmingly favor monetization, with the conspicuous exception of benefits for housing and communal services where sector-specific factors are at work. This is particularly telling given the poor implementation of the first wave of reforms.
机译:2005年1月,俄罗斯对其社会救助体系进行了大修。主要标志是以前以实物形式提供的一些收益的兑现或货币化。本文使用住户调查数据来衡量萨拉托夫地区交通特权货币化的社会和经济影响,并分析了目前获得特权的公民类别对他们的特权在未来进一步转化为现金利益的态度。对于那些通过消费,当地旅行和生活水平的感知变化而进行的改革而受益相对较差的受益人类型,最明显的发现是农村受益人的表现要好于城市受益人。这是意料之中的,因为货币化并未实现主要用于城市居民的交通福利。关于按收入类别划分的结果,尽管总体影响并不大,但经济资源较低的家庭的受益人分布广泛。受益人对特定收益进一步货币化的问题的回答绝大多数都赞成货币化,但明显的例外是住房和公共服务的收益,而特定部门因素正在起作用。鉴于第一轮改革实施不力,这尤其说明问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号