【24h】

Why Settle for 1?

机译:为什么定居1?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I recently received a call from a candidate who had responded to an ad on a well-known comprehensive job board. A third-party recruiting firm retained by the hiring company had posted the position. The candidate submitted his resume and the recruiter called. After a lengthy interview, the recruiter told the candidate he had passed and might be submitted to the company for consideration. What a surprise it was, then, when the recruiter directed the candidate to work only with them for any job the candidate was seeking. The recruiter wanted this candidate to sign an agreement saying he would not work with any other recruiting firm. Decline, I told the candidate. He was clearly dealing with the wrong recruiter: A recruiter should never "own" a candidate.
机译:最近,我接到了一个候选人的电话,他在一个知名的综合性工作板上回应了一个广告。招聘公司聘请的第三方招聘公司已发布职位。候选人提交了简历,应聘者致电。经过长时间的面试,招聘人员告诉应聘者他已通过,可能会提交给公司考虑。那么,当招聘人员指示应聘者仅与他们一起从事应聘者所从事的任何工作时,这真是令人惊讶。招聘者希望这位候选人签署一项协议,说他不会与任何其他招聘公司合作。下降,我告诉候选人。他显然是在与错误的招聘人员打交道:招聘人员绝对不应“拥有”候选人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号