首页> 外文期刊>Precision Agriculture >Selection of ancillary data to derive production management units in sweet corn (Zea Mays var. rugosa) using MANOVA and an information criterion
【24h】

Selection of ancillary data to derive production management units in sweet corn (Zea Mays var. rugosa) using MANOVA and an information criterion

机译:使用MANOVA和信息准则选择辅助数据以推导甜玉米(Zea Mays var。rugosa)的生产管理单位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In production systems where high-resolution harvest data are unavailable there is often a reliance on ancillary information to generate potential management units. In these situations correct identification of relevant sources of data is important to minimize cost to the grower. For three fields in a sweet corn production system in central NSW, Australia, several sets of high-resolution data were obtained using soil and crop canopy sensors. Management units were derived by k-means classification for 2–5 classes using three approaches: (1) with soil data, (2) with crop data and (3) a combination of both soil and crop data. Crop quantity and quality were sampled manually, and the sample data were related to the different management units using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) was then used to rank the different sources of data and the different orders of management units. For irrigated, short-season sweet corn production the management units derived from the crop canopy sensor data explained more variation in key harvest variables than management units derived from an apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa) survey or a mixture of crop and soil sensor data. Management units derived from crop data recorded just prior to side-dressing outperformed management units derived from data recorded earlier in the season. However, multi-temporal classification of early and mid-season crop data gave better results than single layer classification at any time. For all three fields in this study, a 3- or 4-unit classification gave the best results according to the information criterion (AICc). For growers interested in adopting differential management in irrigated sweet corn, investment in a crop canopy sensor will provide more useful high-resolution information than that in a high-resolution ECa survey.
机译:在无法获得高分辨率收割数据的生产系统中,通常依赖于辅助信息来生成潜在的管理单位。在这些情况下,正确识别相关数据源对于最小化种植者的成本很重要。在澳大利亚新南威尔士州中部一个甜玉米生产系统的三个田间,使用土壤和农作物冠层传感器获得了几套高分辨率数据。管理单位是通过k-means分类使用3种方法得出2-5类的:(1)具有土壤数据,(2)具有作物数据,以及(3)土壤和作物数据的组合。人工对作物的数量和质量进行抽样,并使用多变量方差分析(MANOVA)将样本数据与不同的管理单位相关。然后,使用校正后的Akaike信息标准(AICc)对不同数据源和管理单位的不同顺序进行排名。对于灌溉的短季甜玉米生产,与从表观土壤电导率(EC a )调查或从土壤表观电导率得出的管理单位相比,从作物冠层传感器数据得出的管理单位解释了关键收获变量的更多差异。作物和土壤传感器数据的混合。从仅在配药前记录的作物数据得出的管理单位就比从本季节早些时候记录的数据得出的管理单位要好。但是,在任何时候,早期和中期作物数据的多时间分类都比单层分类提供更好的结果。对于本研究中的所有三个领域,根据信息标准(AICc),以3或4单元分类给出了最佳结果。对于有兴趣在灌溉甜玉米中采用差异管理的种植者,与高分辨率EC a 调查相比,对作物冠层传感器的投资将提供更多有用的高分辨率信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号