首页> 外文期刊>Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on >Resonance Behavior and Sensitivity to Detect Mechanical Change in Transformer Winding: Shunt Current Versus Neutral Current
【24h】

Resonance Behavior and Sensitivity to Detect Mechanical Change in Transformer Winding: Shunt Current Versus Neutral Current

机译:检测变压器绕组机械变化的谐振行为和灵敏度:并联电流与中性线电流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Frequency-response measurement offers by far the most sensitive known technique to detect any mechanical deformation in transformer windings. By default, during this measurement, the neutral or line current is considered as the winding response. The overall sensitivity to detect a mechanical change depends not only on the response quantity and the terminal connections chosen, but, also on the arrangement of poles and zeros of the system function. Some pole-zero arrangements are inherently better suited to reveal mechanical changes. Because of this, it is imperative to examine whether neutral current is indeed the best response quantity to consider or if there exists any other quantity, say, for example, total shunt current of the winding (also referred to as the tank current), to accomplish this task better. With this motivation, this paper compares the resonance behavior of neutral and tank current. Based on analytical derivations and actual experiments, it emerges that for detecting simulated mechanical changes, the tank current seems to be a more competent alternative compared to neutral current. It offers enhanced detection sensitivity, especially for interleaved windings. The possible reasons to explain why it is so are presented. The author believes that this finding needs reinforcement by field trials to ascertain its viability.
机译:迄今为止,频率响应测量提供了最灵敏的已知技术来检测变压器绕组中的任何机械变形。默认情况下,在此测量过程中,零线或线路电流被视为绕组响应。检测机械变化的总灵敏度不仅取决于响应量和所选的端子连接,还取决于系统功能的极点和零点的布置。某些零极点安排本质上更适合揭示机械变化。因此,必须检查中性电流是否确实是要考虑的最佳响应量,或者是否存在任何其他量,例如绕组的总分流电流(也称为谐振电流),以达到以下目的:更好地完成这项任务。以此动机为基础,本文比较了中性点电流和谐振电流的谐振行为。根据分析推导和实际实验,可以得出,对于检测模拟的机械变化,与中性电流相比,储能电流似乎是一种更有效的选择。它提供增强的检测灵敏度,尤其是对于交错绕组。提出了解释其原因的可能原因。作者认为,这一发现需要通过现场试验加以加强,以确定其可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号