首页> 外文期刊>Post-Communist Economies >Step or trap? Transition from fixed-term contracts in Central Eastern Europe
【24h】

Step or trap? Transition from fixed-term contracts in Central Eastern Europe

机译:步还是陷阱?从中东欧的定期合同过渡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article investigates the transition from fixed-term contracts to permanent jobs from the viewpoint of the 'stepping stone versus trap' theoretical framework. The main contribution of this research is that it examines what function fixed-term contracts have in the EU new member states, countries that have not yet been investigated in this regard. This research tests which individual characteristics influence the transition to permanent employment and how labour market institutions can help in understanding the differences among countries. The analysis covers the eight post-communist countries which joined the EU in 2004. The period analysed is 2005-10. We make use of the EU-SILC dataset and employ multinomial logistic regression to perform the analysis. The findings reveal that, on average, a temporary job is more a trap than a stepping stone, although considerable differences exist across countries. Surprisingly, most of the individual demographic and human capital characteristics do not have an effect on the transition to permanent employment. Only the age category and work experience significantly increase the chances for a successful transition. Institutions such as employment rigidity and industrial relations explain a considerable amount of the country variations. More rigid labour markets and stronger trade unions lower the probability of successful transition. We argue that the reason is that companies use FTCs as a tool to increase flexibility in rigid labour markets. The concluding part discusses some limitations of the research, links it back to the theoretical literature and suggests some challenges for future research.
机译:本文从“垫脚石与陷阱”理论框架的角度研究了从固定期限合同到永久性工作的过渡。这项研究的主要贡献在于,它研究了定期合同在欧盟新成员国中的功能,这些成员国尚未对此进行调查。这项研究测试了哪些个人特征会影响向永久就业的过渡,以及劳动力市场制度如何帮助理解国家之间的差异。该分析涵盖了2004年加入欧盟的八个后共产主义国家。分析期为2005-10年。我们利用EU-SILC数据集并采用多项逻辑回归进行分析。调查结果表明,尽管各国之间存在很大差异,但平均而言,临时工作比踏脚石更容易成为陷阱。令人惊讶的是,大多数个人人口和人力资本特征对过渡到永久性就业没有影响。只有年龄类别和工作经验才能显着增加成功过渡的机会。诸如就业刚性和劳资关系之类的制度解释了许多国家的差异。更加僵化的劳动力市场和更强大的工会降低了成功过渡的可能性。我们认为,原因是公司使用FTC作为增加刚性劳动力市场灵活性的工具。结论部分讨论了该研究的一些局限性,将其与理论文献联系起来,并提出了未来研究的一些挑战。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Post-Communist Economies》 |2014年第1期|39-52|共14页
  • 作者

    Pavol Babos;

  • 作者单位

    Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:02:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号