首页> 外文期刊>Population Research and Policy Review >The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-Being: A Comparison Across Household Types
【24h】

The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-Being: A Comparison Across Household Types

机译:所得税所得税抵免对经济福祉的影响:不同家庭类型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Using survey data from Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) recipients in Madison County, New York, we evaluate the effectiveness of the EITC in improving the economic well-being of low-income households. In particular, we examine the impact of the EITC across household types. For tax years 2002 through 2004, we find that the EITC is responsible for significantly lowering the poverty rate of EITC recipients, from 57 to 49%. In fact, for households below the poverty line, the EITC fills 31% of the gap between their adjusted gross income and the poverty line. The EITC has the largest impact on single parent households, lowering their poverty rate by 11.2 percentage points and reducing their poverty gap by almost 35%. However, the EITC has negligible effects on the poorest households in the sample—childless singles. A majority (64%) of EITC recipients intends to use at least some of the refund on basic needs and almost half plan on using part of their refund for debt repayment. This suggests that the EITC helps the majority of recipients get by but does not increase their economic mobility. Somewhat surprisingly, single parent households in the sample are not that different from married parent households in terms of EITC amounts, poverty rates, use of credit, and participation in government programs, despite earning less.
机译:我们使用纽约麦迪逊县的收入所得税抵免(EITC)接受者的调查数据,评估了EITC在改善低收入家庭经济状况方面的有效性。特别是,我们研究了EITC对不同家庭类型的影响。从2002到2004纳税年度,我们发现EITC可以将EITC受助人的贫困率从57%显着降低到49%。实际上,对于贫困线以下的家庭,EITC填补了他们调整后的总收​​入和贫困线之间31%的缺口。 EITC对单亲家庭的影响最大,将其贫困率降低了11.2个百分点,并将贫困差距减少了近35%。但是,EITC对样本中最贫困的家庭(无子女的单身人士)的影响可忽略不计。大部分(64%)的EITC接受者打算将至少部分退款用于基本需求,将近一半的计划将部分退款用于偿还债务。这表明EITC可以帮助大多数接受者摆脱困境,但不会增加他们的经济流动性。令人惊讶的是,尽管收入较低,但样本中的单亲家庭与已婚父母家庭在EITC金额,贫困率,信贷使用和参与政府计划方面并没有什么不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号