...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Approximate Reasoning >Improving and benchmarking of algorithms for Γ-maximin, Γ-maximax and interval dominance
【24h】

Improving and benchmarking of algorithms for Γ-maximin, Γ-maximax and interval dominance

机译:γ-maximin,γ-maximax和间隔优势算法的改进和基准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Γ-maximin, Γ-maximax and interval dominance are familiar decision criteria for making decisions under severe uncertainty, when probability distributions can only be partially identified. One can apply these three criteria by solving sequences of linear programs. In this study, we present new algorithms for these criteria and compare their performance to existing standard algorithms. Specifically, we use efficient ways, based on previous work, to find common initial feasible points for these algorithms. Exploiting these initial feasible points, we develop early stopping criteria to determine whether gambles are either Γ-maximin, Γ-maximax or interval dominant. We observe that the primal-dual interior point method benefits considerably from these improvements. In our simulation, we find that our proposed algorithms outperform the standard algorithms when the size of the domain of lower previsions is less or equal to the sizes of decisions and outcomes. However, our proposed algorithms do not outperform the standard algorithms in the case that the size of the domain of lower previsions is much larger than the sizes of decisions and outcomes.
机译:γ-Maximin,γ-Maximax和间隔优势是熟悉在严重不确定性下做出决策的熟悉决策标准,当概率分布只能部分识别时。可以通过求解线性程序序列来应用这三个标准。在本研究中,我们为这些标准提供了新的算法,并将其性能与现有的标准算法进行比较。具体地,我们使用基于以前的工作的有效方式,找到这些算法的常见初始可行点。利用这些初始可行点,我们开发早期停止标准,以确定赌博是否是γ-maximin,γ-maximax或间隔显性。我们观察到原始 - 双重点法从这些改进方面受益匪浅。在我们的模拟中,我们发现我们所提出的算法优于标准算法,当较低预防域的尺寸较小或等于决策和结果的大小时。然而,我们所提出的算法在较低预防域的大小远大于决策和结果的尺寸的情况下,我们的提出算法并不优于标准算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号