首页> 外文期刊>Political Behavior >Deliberation, Democratic Decision-Making and Internal Political Efficacy
【24h】

Deliberation, Democratic Decision-Making and Internal Political Efficacy

机译:审议,民主决策和内部政治效力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Empirical research into the possible positive consequences of deliberation increasingly reveals that there is a complex relationship between deliberation and its effects on citizens. In this experimental study I examine the relationship between internal political efficacy and one type of deliberation: deliberative decision-making. I also test whether different structures of decision-making mediate between deliberation and internal political efficacy. The data suggest that deliberative decision-making had no direct effect on a global measure of internal political efficacy. Participants in face-to-face deliberative decision-making, though, had higher scores on a situation-specific measure of internal political efficacy than participants who only voted. The structures of decision-making had no effect on either measure of internal political efficacy. These results support claims that deliberation will not necessarily lead to direct, positive effects on citizens internal political efficacy, but they also highlight the likelihood that face-to-face deliberation can lead citizens to feel more competent in their deliberative abilities.
机译:对审议可能产生的积极后果的实证研究越来越多地表明,审议及其对公民的影响之间存在复杂的关系。在这项实验研究中,我研究了内部政治效力与一种审议类型之间的关系:协商性决策。我还测试了决策的不同结构是否在审议与内部政治效力之间进行调解。数据表明,协商性决策对内部政治效力的全球衡量没有直接影响。但是,面对面协商性决策的参与者在特定情况下衡量内部政治效能的得分要高于只投票的参与者。决策的结构对内部政治效力的任何一种衡量都没有影响。这些结果支持这样的主张,即商议并不一定会对公民的内部政治效力产生直接,积极的影响,但它们也凸显了面对面的商议可能会使公民感到自己的议事能力更加胜任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号