首页> 外文期刊>Political Behavior >“Racial Threat”, Partisan Climate, and Direct Democracy: Contextual Effects in Three California Initiatives
【24h】

“Racial Threat”, Partisan Climate, and Direct Democracy: Contextual Effects in Three California Initiatives

机译:“种族威胁”,游击党气候和直接民主:加利福尼亚三项倡议的背景影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Does context—racial, economic, fiscal, and political—affect whites’ votes on racially-related ballot propositions? We examine non-Hispanic whites’ voting behavior on three California ballot initiatives: Propositions 187, 209, and 227. Unlike previous analyses that lacked individual-level data and were therefore limited to ecological inference, we combine individual-level data from exit polls with county-level contextual variables in a hierarchical linear model. Racial/ethnic context affected whites’ votes only on Proposition 187, economic context had no influence on vote choice, and the effect of fiscal context was limited to Proposition 227. However, across the propositions, whites’ decisions were shaped by their political context. Thus, we do not find support for the “racial threat” hypothesis across all racially-charged issues.
机译:种族,经济,财政和政治等背景因素是否会影响白人对与种族相关的选票主张的投票?我们根据加利福尼亚州的三种投票计划(第187、209和227号提案)研究了非西班牙裔白人的投票行为。与之前的缺乏个体水平数据并因此仅限于生态推断的分析不同,我们将退出民意调查的个体水平数据与分层线性模型中的县级上下文变量。种族/民族背景仅影响白人对187号提案的投票,经济背景对投票选择没有影响,财政背景的影响仅限于227号提案。但是,在所有主张中,白人的决定是由其政治背景决定的。因此,在所有涉及种族问题的问题上,我们都没有找到支持“种族威胁”假说的依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号