首页> 外文期刊>Political Behavior >Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment
【24h】

Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment

机译:政治会影响招聘吗?随机实验的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Do resumes with political “signals” make job applicants more or less likely to get hired? To test our theory that employers are more likely to hire like-minded partisans (and less likely to hire those of opposing partisan bents), we conduct a randomized experiment, sending out 1,200 politically branded resumes in response to help-wanted ads in two U.S. counties—one highly conservative and the other, highly liberal. In our pooled sample, we find that job seekers with minority partisan affiliations are statistically less likely to obtain a callback than candidates without any partisan affiliation. Meanwhile, applicants sharing the majority partisan affiliation are not significantly more likely to receive a callback than non-partisan candidates. These results suggest that individuals may sometimes place themselves at a disadvantage by including partisan cues on their resumes.
机译:带有政治“信号”的履历是否会使求职者或多或少被聘用的可能性?为了检验我们的理论,即雇主更有可能雇用志趣相投的党派人士(而较少雇用与党派倾向相对的党派人士),我们进行了一项随机实验,分发了1200个带有政治商标的履历表,以回应两个美国的帮助广告。县-一个高度保守,另一个高度自由。在我们的汇总样本中,我们发现具有统计数据的具有少数党派关系的求职者比没有任何党派关系的候选人获得回调的可能性要小。同时,拥有多数党派隶属关系的申请人比没有党派候选人的回覆可能性不大。这些结果表明,个人有时可能会在自己的简历中加入党派暗示,从而处于不利地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号