首页> 外文期刊>Policy Studies >Revisiting demand, politicization and externalization in authoritarian political regimes: policy advisory system in Russian practices
【24h】

Revisiting demand, politicization and externalization in authoritarian political regimes: policy advisory system in Russian practices

机译:重新审视威权政治体制中的需求,政治化和外部化:俄罗斯实践中的政策咨询系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study contributes to debate on three related questions in Policy Advisory System research. Is the Policy Advisory System concept applicable in countries other than developed democracies? How does it function in a state-centred authoritarian regime? How does the authoritarian environment affect tendencies such as "politicization" and "externalization"? These questions are addressed using materials on the current Russian governance structure and advisory practices, focusing on two broadly defined "governance subsystems" in the Presidential Administration of Russia, "Political Bloc" and "Economic Bloc", both acting as regular customers for advisory communities. One finding is the phenomenon of "Dual Demand" from the same centre of power-"stability" for "Political Bloc" and "innovation" for "Economic Bloc"-which contributed to creation of two different clusters of policy advisory agencies with different statuses. Other findings include transformation of "politicization" to policy control mechanisms and attempted "externalization" turning into the reverse-"internalization"-bringing independent advisory organizations under the supervision of government structures.
机译:这项研究有助于就政策咨询系统研究中的三个相关问题进行辩论。政策咨询系统的概念是否适用于发达民主国家以外的其他国家?它在以国家为中心的威权政权中如何运作?威权环境如何影响诸如“政治化”和“外部化”之类的趋势?这些问题是通过使用有关当前俄罗斯治理结构和咨询实践的材料来解决的,重点是俄罗斯总统府中两个广泛定义的“治理子系统”,即“政治集团”和“经济集团”,它们都是咨询社区的定期客户。一个发现是同一权力中心的“双重需求”现象-“政治集团”的“稳定”和“经济集团”的“创新”-促成两个不同地位的政策咨询机构集群的建立。其他发现包括将“政治化”转变为政策控制机制,并试图将“外部化”转变为反向“内部化”,从而在政府机构的监督下带来独立的咨询组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号