首页> 外文期刊>Planning Perspectives >Bubonic plague, colonial ideologies, and urban planning policies: Dakar, Lagos, and Kumasi
【24h】

Bubonic plague, colonial ideologies, and urban planning policies: Dakar, Lagos, and Kumasi

机译:鼠疫,殖民地意识形态和城市规划政策:达喀尔,拉各斯和库马西

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Third Plague Pandemic originated in Southwest China in the mid-nineteenth century, reached Africa's shores around 1900, and spread globally for about a century. This article examines three plague loci in colonial Senegal (Dakar, 1914), Nigeria (Lagos, 1924), and the Gold Coast (today's Ghana; Kumasi, 1924). A tripartite comparative analysis is made of French and British doctrines of colonial rule, colonial urban planning policies, and anti-plague practices. While some common features are demonstrated in the policies and practices of the colonizing forces such as the implementation of rigorous measures and embracing segregationist solutions, divergent features can also be distinguished. These relate to the methods of implementation of planning and anti-plague policies, in accordance with colonial ideology (assimilation, direct and indirect rule); and to the very nature of autochthonous communities, responses, and levels of agitation. Our both comparative and more nuanced site-related view is also based on a large collection of archival and secondary materials from multilateral channels.
机译:第三次鼠疫大流行起源于19世纪中叶的西南地区,大约在1900年到达非洲沿岸,并在全球蔓延了大约一个世纪。本文研究了塞内加尔殖民地(达喀尔,1914年),尼日利亚(拉各斯,1924年)和黄金海岸(今天的加纳;库马西,1924年)中的三个鼠疫位点。对法国和英国的殖民统治,殖民城市规划政策和抗瘟疫实践进行了三方比较分析。尽管在殖民军的政策和实践中表现出一些共同的特征,例如执行严格的措施和采用隔离主义解决方案,但也可以区分不同的特征。这些与根据殖民地意识形态(同化,直接和间接统治)实施计划和抗鼠疫政策的方法有关;以及土生土长的社区的性质,回应和激动的程度。我们的比较性观点和与地点有关的细微差别也基于多边渠道的大量档案资料和辅助资料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号