首页> 外文期刊>Pipeline & gas journal >Future Policy Implications and Response to 'Big Green' Advocacy
【24h】

Future Policy Implications and Response to 'Big Green' Advocacy

机译:未来的政策影响和对“大绿色”宣传的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite the critical importance of energy to every American family and business, the debate surrounding America's abundant natural resources has become increasingly polarized over the past decade. Protests and shouting matches have replaced the pursuit of balanced, non-partisan policy solutions. Anti-energy groups including heavily funded Big Green organizations have increasingly used intimidation tactics and teaming up with fringe social justice movements to impose an anti-fossil energy agenda upon policymakers. These organizations often pose as local community activists proffering less-than-factual emotional arguments to gamer support.While we all strongly support continued environmental protection, it is imperative to recognize that our society is completely dependent on affordable and reliable energy. Therefore, it is critical that we strike the proper balance between ongoing environmental progress and energy development- without sacrificing the progress we have made or harming families, the environment or our future. We can and must have both- a clean environment and access to energy.
机译:尽管能源至关重要对每个美国家族和企业的重要性,但周围的辩论在过去十年中越来越多地偏离。抗议和呼喊的比赛取代了追求平衡,非党派政策解决方案。包括庞大资助的大绿洲的反能集团越来越多地使用恐吓战术,并与边缘社会正义动作组成,以对政策制定者施加抗化石能源议程。这些组织往往占地方社区活动家,为游戏商提供了不利的情感论证。我们都强烈支持持续的环保,必须认识到我们的社会完全依赖于实惠和可靠的能量。因此,我们致力于在持续的环境进步和能源发展之间取得适当的平衡 - 而不牺牲我们所做的进展或损害家庭,环境或未来的进展。我们可以并且必须具有干净的环境和能量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Pipeline & gas journal》 |2019年第1期|28-30|共2页
  • 作者

    David Holt;

  • 作者单位

    energy consultancy HBW Resources;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 21:44:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号