首页> 外文期刊>Physical Therapy >A Qualitative Application of the Diffusion of Innovations Theory to Examine Determinants of Guideline Adherence Among Physical Therapists
【24h】

A Qualitative Application of the Diffusion of Innovations Theory to Examine Determinants of Guideline Adherence Among Physical Therapists

机译:定性应用创新扩散理论检查物理治疗师中准则依从性的决定因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Evidence-based practice has become a major issue in physical therapy. Many evidence-based guidelines, however, are not used extensively after dissemination, and interventions aimed at increasing guideline adherence often have limited effects. As a prerequisite for changing this situation, the aims of this study were to gain an in-depth understanding of the determinants of guideline adherence among physical therapists in the Netherlands and to evaluate the opportunities of a theoretical framework in this respect. This observational study consisted of 3 focus group interviews (n=12, 10, and 8) between November 2002 and January 2003. Physical therapists were asked to discuss their opinions about and experiences with the Dutch guidelines for low back pain. Data were analyzed qualitatively using a directed approach to content analysis. Both the interview route and the analysis of the interviews were informed by Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations Theory. Our study yielded in-depth insights into the various determinants of guideline adherence. Overall, the participants had rather unfavorable opinions about issues related to the dissemination of the guidelines (first phase of the diffusion process) and provided relatively little information on the subsequent adoption process (second phase of the diffusion process). The theoretical framework appeared to be a useful tool to properly structure the focus group interviews, to systematically analyze the data collected, and to determine that supplementary interviews would be necessary to cover the entire diffusion process. Our findings indicated that the diffusion process of guidelines among physical therapists was not yet completed. The use of theory can provide added value to guideline implementation studies.
机译:循证实践已成为物理治疗中的主要问题。但是,许多基于证据的指南在散布后并未得到广泛使用,并且旨在提高对指南的遵守率的干预措施通常效果有限。作为改变这种状况的先决条件,本研究的目的是深入了解荷兰物理治疗师中遵循指南的决定因素,并评估这方面的理论框架的机会。这项观察性研究包括2002年11月至2003年1月之间的3个焦点小组访谈(n = 12、10和8)。请理疗师讨论他们对荷兰下腰痛指南的看法和经验。使用定向方法对内容进行定性分析。罗杰斯的《创新理论的扩散》为访谈的途径和访谈的分析提供了信息。我们的研究对准则遵守的各种决定因素产生了深刻的见解。总体而言,参与者对与指南分发(发行过程的第一阶段)有关的问题持相当不利的意见,而对于随后的采纳过程(发行过程的第二阶段)则提供的信息很少。理论框架似乎是一个有用的工具,可以适当地组织焦点小组访谈,系统地分析收集的数据,并确定补充访谈对于覆盖整个传播过程将是必要的。我们的发现表明,物理治​​疗师中指南的传播过程尚未完成。理论的使用可以为准则实施研究提供附加值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Physical Therapy》 |2009年第3期|p.221-232|共12页
  • 作者单位

    J Harting, PhD, BA in Physiotherapy, is Postdoctoral Researcher, IQ Healthcare, University Medical Centre St Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands, and Department of Social Medicine, Amsterdam Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Address all correspondence to Dr Harting at: j.harting@ iq.umcn.nl.GMJ Rutten, MPT, MPH, is a PhD student, IQ Healthcare, University Medical Centre St Radboud, and a practicing manual physical therapist, Uden, the Netherlands.STJ Rutten, MPT, MPH, is a practicing manual physical therapist, Aachen, Germany.SP Kremers, PhD, is Assistant Professor, Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.[Harting J, Rutten GMJ, Rutten STJ, Kremers SP. A qualitative application of the Diffusion of Innovations Theory to examine determinants of guideline adherence among physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2009,89:221-232.]© 2009 American Physical Therapy Association,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:44:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号