...
首页> 外文期刊>Physical Communication >Comparison of sparse recovery algorithms for channel estimation in underwater acoustic OFDM with data-driven sparsity learning
【24h】

Comparison of sparse recovery algorithms for channel estimation in underwater acoustic OFDM with data-driven sparsity learning

机译:数据驱动稀疏学习的水下声OFDM信道估计稀疏恢复算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Through exploiting the sparse nature of underwater acoustic (UWA) channels, compressed sensing (CS) based sparse channel estimation has demonstrated superior performance compared to the conventional least-squares (LS) method. However, a priori information of channel sparsity is often required to set a regularization constraint. In this work, we propose a data-driven sparsity learning approach based on a linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) equalizer to tune the regularization parameter for the orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) transmissions. A golden section search is used to accelerate the sparsity learning process. In the context of the intercarrier interference (ICI)-ignorant and ICI-aware UWA OFDM systems, the block error rates (BLERs) using different sparse recovery algorithms for channel estimation under the L_0, L_(1/2), L_1, and L_2 constraints are compared. Simulation and experimental results show that the data-driven sparsity learning approach is effective, overcoming the drawback of using a fixed regularization parameter in different channel conditions. When the sparsity parameter for each approach is optimized based on the data-driven approach, the L_(1/2) recovery algorithm and the considered four L_1 recovery algorithms: SpaRSA, FISTA, Nesterov, and TwIST, have nearly the same BLER performance, outperforming L_0 and L_2 algorithms.
机译:通过利用水下声学(UWA)通道的稀疏特性,与传统的最小二乘(LS)方法相比,基于压缩感知(CS)的稀疏通道估计已显示出优异的性能。然而,通常需要信道稀疏性的先验信息来设置正则化约束。在这项工作中,我们提出一种基于线性最小均方误差(LMMSE)均衡器的数据驱动稀疏学习方法,以调整正交频分复用(OFDM)传输的正则化参数。黄金分割搜索用于加速稀疏性学习过程。在无载波间干扰(ICI)和ICI感知的UWA OFDM系统的背景下,使用不同的稀疏恢复算法对L_0,L_(1/2),L_1和L_2下的信道进行估计的误块率(BLER)比较约束。仿真和实验结果表明,数据驱动的稀疏性学习方法是有效的,克服了在不同的信道条件下使用固定的正则化参数的缺点。当根据数据驱动方法优化每种方法的稀疏性参数时,L_(1/2)恢复算法和考虑的四种L_1恢复算法:SpaRSA,FISTA,Nesterov和TwIST具有几乎相同的BLER性能,优于L_0和L_2算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号