...
首页> 外文期刊>Photovoltaics, IEEE Journal of >On the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods for PV Systems
【24h】

On the Perturb-and-Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Methods for PV Systems

机译:光伏系统的微扰观测和增量电导MPPT方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents a detailed analysis of the two most well-known hill-climbing maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms: the perturb-and-observe (P&O) and incremental conductance (INC). The purpose of the analysis is to clarify some common misconceptions in the literature regarding these two trackers, therefore helping the selection process for a suitable MPPT for both researchers and industry. The two methods are thoroughly analyzed both from a mathematical and practical implementation point of view. Their mathematical analysis reveals that there is no difference between the two. This has been confirmed by experimental tests according to the EN 50530 standard, resulting in a deviation between their efficiencies of 0.13% in dynamic and as low as 0.02% under static conditions. The results show that despite the common opinion in the literature, the P&O and INC are equivalent.
机译:本文对两种最著名的爬山最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)算法进行了详细分析:扰动观测(P&O)和增量电导(INC)。分析的目的是弄清文献中关于这两种跟踪器的一些常见误解,从而有助于为研究人员和行业选择合适的MPPT的过程。从数学和实际实现的角度对这两种方法进行了全面分析。他们的数学分析表明,两者之间没有区别。根据EN 50530标准的实验测试已证实了这一点,从而导致它们的动态效率差异为0.13%,在静态条件下仅为0.02%。结果表明,尽管在文献中有共识,但P&O和INC是等效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号