首页> 外文期刊>Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy >Ex vivo comparison of antibacterial efficacy of conventional chemomechanical debridement alone and in combination with light- activated disinfection and laser irradiation against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm
【24h】

Ex vivo comparison of antibacterial efficacy of conventional chemomechanical debridement alone and in combination with light- activated disinfection and laser irradiation against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm

机译:常规化学机械清创术与光活化消毒和激光辐照结合对粪肠球菌生物膜的体外抗菌作用的离体比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and objectives: Intracanal disinfection plays an important role in endodontic treatment success. Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is a resistant microorganism responsible for endodontic infections. We aimed to assess the bactericidal effects of three disinfection methods on E. faecalis biofilm.Materials and methods: Fifty- five freshly extracted single-rooted human teeth were evaluated. A barbed broach was used to extract the pulp tissue. No further root canal preparation was performed. Specimens were sterilized with gamma radiation, and inoculated with E. faecalis suspension. They were then incubated for 4 days and 4 weeks. Biofilm formation was confirmed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The teeth were randomly assigned to three subgroups (n = 7) to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of the following three disinfection methods against immature (4-day) and mature (4-week) biofilms: the conventional chemomechanical debridement (CCMD), CCMD + light-activated disinfection (LAD; 810 nm, 0.3 W, 120 J/cm(2)) with indocyanine Green (EmunDo) as photosensitizer and CCMD + diode laser irradiation (810 nm, 2 W). The teeth were then longitudinally split into two halves and the colony count was reported as colony forming units (CFUs) to assess bacterial viability after each disinfection protocol.Results: None of the disinfection methods could completely remove the biofilm. CCMD + LAD caused the highest and CCMD + diode laser caused the lowest reduction in biofilm. Antibacterial efficacy was significantly lower against the mature (4-week) biofilm compared with immature (4-day) biofilm in all groups (P < 0.05).Conclusion: All three disinfection methods were effective for partial elimination of E. faecalis biofilm. But CCMD + LAD was significantly more efficacious in decreasing both mature and immature biofilms.
机译:背景与目的:根管内消毒在牙髓治疗成功方面起着重要作用。粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)是引起牙髓感染的耐药微生物。我们旨在评估三种消毒方法对粪肠球菌生物膜的杀菌作用。材料和方法:评价了55个新鲜提取的单根人牙。用带刺的拉刀提取纸浆组织。没有进行进一步的根管准备。用γ射线对标本消毒,并用粪肠球菌悬浮液接种。然后将它们温育4天和4周。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)确认生物膜的形成。牙齿被随机分为三个亚组(n = 7),以评估以下三种消毒方法对未成熟(4天)和成熟(4周)生物膜的抗菌效力:常规化学机械清创术(CCMD),CCMD +光敏消毒(LAD; 810 nm,0.3 W,120 J / cm(2)),吲哚菁绿(EmunDo)作为光敏剂和CCMD +二极管激光辐照(810 nm,2 W)。然后将牙齿纵向分成两半,菌落计数以菌落形成单位(CFU)的形式报告,以评估每次消毒方案后的细菌生存力。结果:没有一种消毒方法能够完全去除生物膜。 CCMD + LAD引起的生物膜减少最少,而CCMD +二极管激光器引起的生物膜减少最少。与未成熟(4天)生物膜相比,所有组对成熟(4周)生物膜的抗菌效力均显着降低(P <0.05)。结论:三种消毒方法均能部分消除屎肠球菌生物膜。但是,CCMD + LAD在减少成熟和不成熟生物膜方面明显更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号