...
首页> 外文期刊>Phlebology >The American College of Phlebology 22nd Annual Congress: Marco Island, USA, 6–9 November 2008
【24h】

The American College of Phlebology 22nd Annual Congress: Marco Island, USA, 6–9 November 2008

机译:美国静脉生物学会第二十二届年会:美国马可岛,2008年11月6日至9日

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Short- and mid-term side-effects of sclerotherapy, in particular with polidocanol, have been previously described in our registry of 12,173 sessions. With this follow-up registry, the incidence of long-term adverse events was evaluated. nnMethod: Physicians involved in the initial French registry have been contacted and asked to take part in the follow-up survey. Initially included patients have been controlled at the latest possible date in order to determine whether a complication had occurred after the end of the initial survey. nnResults: Data on 1605 patients included during the initial registry have been reviewed with a maximum follow-up of 60 months covering 3357 patient years. A total of five adverse events have been observed in patients treated with liquid polidocanol and 46 adverse events in patients treated with foam. Most frequent side-effects were visual disturbances with a total number of 14 and most severe were eight muscular vein thrombosis. The onset of side-effects was mostly observed directly after sclerotherapy or in the first six months afterwards (87% in the first year). One deep vein thrombosis recurrence occurred in a patient with heterozygote Factor V Leiden after stopping anticoagulant treatment. nnConclusion: Sclerotherapy with polidocanol is safe, especially long term. The use of liquid, with an incidence of side-effects lower than 0.4%, is perfectly fit for the treatment of benign lesions, such as small varices, reticular veins or telangiectasias, whereas foamed polidocanol used in the treatment of large varicose veins presents less side-effects than surgery with which it now competes. nnPotential conflict of interest? Yes. Conflict details: honoraria main investigator of the study. nnOutside funding? Yes. Funding details: Kreussler Pharma, Wiesbaden, Germany.
机译:目的:硬化疗法的短期和中期副作用,特别是与多多酚的使用,已经在我们的12,173个疗程中进行了描述。通过该随访记录,评估了长期不良事件的发生率。 nnMethod:已联系最初的法国注册处的医师,并被要求参加随访调查。最初纳入的患者已在最可能的日期进行了控制,以确定最初调查结束后是否发生了并发症。结果:初次登记期间纳入的1605例患者的数据已经过回顾,最多随访60个月,涵盖3357例患者。用液体波多克多醇治疗的患者总共观察到五个不良事件,而用泡沫治疗的患者共观察到46个不良事件。最常见的副作用是视觉障碍,总数为14,最严重的是八次肌肉静脉血栓形成。副作用的发作大多在硬化疗法后或之后的头六个月内直接观察到(第一年为87%)。停止抗凝治疗后,杂合子因子V Leiden的患者发生了一次深静脉血栓复发。 nn结论:polidocanol进行硬化疗法是安全的,尤其是长期使用。液体的使用,其副作用发生率低于0.4%,非常适合治疗良性病变,例如小静脉曲张,网状静脉或毛细血管扩张,而发泡的波多克多醇用于治疗大的静脉曲张则较少副作用,而不是现在与之竞争的手术。 nn潜在的利益冲突?是。冲突细节:酬金研究的主要研究员。 nn外部资金?是。资金细节:德国威斯巴登的克罗伊斯勒制药公司。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Phlebology》 |2009年第2期|p.85-95|共11页
  • 作者单位

    * Cabinet de Phlebologie 32 Dubouchage, Nice, France;

    Chemische Fabrik Kreussler GMBH, Wiesbaden, Germany;

    CENBIOTECH, Dijon, France;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号