首页> 外文期刊>Philosophia >Artifact and Essence
【24h】

Artifact and Essence

机译:神器与精华

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

An essential property is a property that an object possesses in every possible world in which that object exists. An individual essence is a property (or set of properties) that an object possesses in every world in which that object exists, and that no other object possesses in any possible world. Call the claim that some artifacts possess an individual essence ‘artifactual essentialism’. I will argue that artifactual essentialism is true. In doing so, I will be responding to two recent arguments by Penelope Mackie against artifactual essentialism (Mackie (2006), esp. ch. 3.). In “Individual Essence Properties”, I will rehearse the qualifications that any property must meet if it is to constitute an individual essence, and in “Artifacts and the Recycling Problem” and “Artifacts and the Tolerance Problem”, I will rehearse Mackie’s arguments against artifactual essentialism. In “Artifacts and Weak Unshareability?” and “Artifacts and Strong Unshareability?”, I will show why both of these arguments fail. In “Mona Lisa’s Essence”, I will defend the interesting claim that some artifacts possess an individual essence. In the final section I will entertain some objections to my proposal.
机译:本质属性是对象在该对象存在的每个可能世界中拥有的属性。个体本质是一个对象在存在该对象的每个世界中拥有的一个属性(或一组属性),并且在任何可能的世界中没有其他对象拥有。称某些人工制品具有个别本质的主张称为“人工本质论”。我将辩称,人为的本质主义是正确的。在此过程中,我将回应Penelope Mackie最近提出的两个反对人为本质主义的论点(Mackie(2006年),特别是第3章)。在“个体本质属性”中,我将演练任何财产要构成个人本质所必须具备的资格;在“人工制品和回收问题”和“人工制品和容忍问题”中,我将演练麦琪反对的论点。人为的本质主义。在“工件和不可共享性弱吗?”中和“工件和不可共享性?”,我将说明为什么这两个论点都失败了。在“蒙娜·丽莎的精华”中,我将捍卫有趣的说法,即某些人工制品具有独立的本质。在最后一节中,我将对我的提案表示反对。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号