首页> 外文期刊>Philosophy & technology >Is Proprietary Software Unjust? Examining the Ethical Foundations of Free Software
【24h】

Is Proprietary Software Unjust? Examining the Ethical Foundations of Free Software

机译:专有软件是否不公正?检查自由软件的道德基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

“Free software” is software that respects the users’ freedoms by granting them access to the source code, and allowing them to modify and redistribute the software at will. Richard Stallman, founder of the Free software movement, has argued that creating and distributing non-Free software is always a moral injustice. In this essay, I try to identify the ethical foundations of Stallmanism. I identify three major trends in Stallman’s thinking—libertarian, utilitarian, and communitarian—and I argue that none is sufficient to justify the radical claim that distributing non-Free software is always wrong (unless we accept extremely demanding ethical standards that Stallman himself does not consistently endorse). I recommend thinking of Stallmanism as an attempt to optimize the satisfaction of a number of core values, including freedom, cooperation, and happiness, and I stress the importance of connecting the Free software movement to other political struggles against oppression.
机译:“自由软件”是通过授予用户访问源代码的权限并允许他们随意修改和重新分发软件的方式,尊重用户的自由。自由软件运动的创始人理查德·斯托曼(Richard Stallman)认为,创建和分发非自由软件始终在道德上是不公正的。在本文中,我尝试确定Stallmanism的伦理基础。我确定了斯托曼思想的三个主要趋势,即自由主义,功利主义和共产主义。我认为,这不足以证明激进的说法,即分发非免费软件总是错误的(除非我们接受极其苛刻的道德标准,而斯托尔本人并没有这样做)一致认可)。我建议将Stallmanism视为试图优化包括自由,合作和幸福在内的许多核心价值观的满意度,并强调将自由软件运动与其他反对压迫的政治斗争联系起来的重要性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Philosophy & technology》 |2018年第3期|437-453|共17页
  • 作者

    Jesse Rappaport;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:05:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号