首页> 外文期刊>Knowledge Technology & Policy >'There's an App for That': Technical Standards and Commodification by Technological Means
【24h】

'There's an App for That': Technical Standards and Commodification by Technological Means

机译:“有一个应用程序”:技术标准和通过技术手段进行商品化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Though the term "commodification" is used broadly, a theory of the processes by which goods become exchangeable and in fact objects of monetized exchange reveals a key site for technological politics. Commodities are goods that are alienable, somewhat rival, generally with low exclusion costs, and that are often consumed in use. Technological advances can affect all of these traits for certain goods, effectively bringing about a process of commodification by technological means. However, in order to function with specific contexts, technologies are designed and manufactured according to technical standards, standards that in turn take on features of what David Grewal (2008) has called "network power." As such, standard setting processes become the potential locus for political argument over the legitimacy of a commodification process. Theorists hoping to develop more democratic theories of technological governance should thus recognize the significance of standards and the role they play in either promoting or controlling social relations organized according to the norms of monetized exchange.
机译:尽管广泛使用了“商品化”一词,但有关商品可交换过程的理论以及实际上货币化交换的对象的理论揭示了技术政治的一个重要场所。商品是可转让的商品,在某种程度上可以与之竞争,排他成本通常较低,并且经常在使用中消费。技术进步可以影响某些商品的所有这些特征,从而有效地通过技术手段实现商品化。但是,为了在特定环境下运行,技术是根据技术标准设计和制造的,这些标准又具有David Grewal(2008)所谓的“网络力量”的特征。因此,标准制定过程成为有关商品化过程合法性的政治辩论的潜在场所。因此,希望发展更民主的技术治理理论的理论家应该认识到标准的重要性及其在促进或控制根据货币化交换规范组织的社会关系中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号