首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on science >Are Experts Representative of Non-Experts? Elective Modernism, Aspects of Representation, and the Argument from Inductive Risk
【24h】

Are Experts Representative of Non-Experts? Elective Modernism, Aspects of Representation, and the Argument from Inductive Risk

机译:是代表非专家的专家吗?选举人的现代主义,表现的方面,以及来自归纳风险的论证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The approach to expert communities and political representation of non-experts in Harry Collins and Robert Evans’ elective modernism reflects the conviction that experts are not representative of ordinary citizens. I use an analysis of aspects of representation and the argument from inductive risk to argue that experts can be seen as representative of (some) non-experts, when we understand representation as resemblance based on shared social perspectives and acknowledge the inevitable involvement of such perspectives in decisions under inductive risk. This, in turn, has implications for some of the proposals about practices and institutions made in elective modernism.
机译:哈利柯林斯非专家的专家社区和政治代表的方法反映了专家不代表普通公民的信念。我使用对代表性方面的分析和来自归纳风险的论证,认为专家可以被视为(某些)非专家的代表,当我们理解基于共享社会视角的同志,并承认此类观点的必然参与在归纳风险下的决定。反过来,这对某些关于选修现代主义的实践和机构的一些建议有影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Perspectives on science》 |2020年第4期|459-481|共23页
  • 作者

    Jaana Eigi;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy University of Tartu;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 21:23:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号