...
首页> 外文期刊>Pennsylvania journal of environmental litigation >DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND/OR CERTIFICATION OF THE COURT'S JUNE 30,2010 ORDER
【24h】

DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND/OR CERTIFICATION OF THE COURT'S JUNE 30,2010 ORDER

机译:被告在法院澄清和/或认证的动议上的答辩摘要(2010年6月30日)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Opposition filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection ("PADEP"), confirms that the parties have widely divergent views of this Court's June 30,2010 Order ("Order") and how this litigation should proceed. PADEP argues that the Order prohibits Lockheed Martin Corporation ("LMC") from reducing its liability in this lawsuit based upon the actions of other Commonwealth agencies or instrumentalities. LMC has the opposite view. In light of this difference of opinion, LMC respectfully requests that the Court clarify whether LMC can defend itself by proving the Commonwealth, acting through its agencies or instrumentalities other than PADEP, bears some portion of the liability at Quehanna.
机译:由宾夕法尼亚州宾夕法尼亚州环境保护局(“ PADEP”)提出的异议,确认当事方对本法院2010年6月30日的命令(以下称“命令”)以及该诉讼应如何进行持广泛分歧。 PADEP辩称,该命令禁止洛克希德·马丁公司(LMC)根据其他联邦机构或工具的行为减少其在本诉讼中的责任。 LMC持有相反的观点。鉴于这种意见分歧,LMC谨请法院澄清LMC是否可以通过证明其联邦通过其代理机构或PADEP以外的其他手段行事为自己辩护,而这在Quehanna承担部分责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号