...
首页> 外文期刊>Pennsylvania journal of environmental litigation >Judge finds abstention opinion in Raritan Baykeeper does not warrant reconsideration of Interfaith decision
【24h】

Judge finds abstention opinion in Raritan Baykeeper does not warrant reconsideration of Interfaith decision

机译:法官在Raritan Baykeeper中发现弃权意见,不保证重新考虑宗教信仰的裁决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

U.S. Chief Garrett E. Brown Jr. of the District of New Jersey held on July 9 that the recent abstention decision in Raritan Baykeeper, Inc. v. NL Indus., Inc., (D.N.J. No 09-4117) does not warrant reconsideration of a ruling which found that a consent judgment resolving all of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection's RCRA claims against PPG Industries Inc. does not moot the claims of Interfaith Community Organization and other groupsarising from chromium contamination of the Garfield Ave. site in Jersey City, New Jersey.
机译:美国新泽西州区长加勒特·E·布朗(Garrett E. Brown Jr.)于7月9日裁定,Raritan Baykeeper,Inc.诉NL Indus。,Inc.(DNJ No 09-4117)最近的弃权决定不值得重新考虑一项裁决裁定,一项解决新泽西州环境保护部针对PPG Industries Inc.的RCRA所有索赔的同意判决,并不涉及Interfaith社区组织和其他因泽西城加菲猫大道加工厂的铬污染而引起的其他团体的索赔,新泽西州。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号