...
首页> 外文期刊>Pennsylvania journal of environmental litigation >Partners say 'adverse inference' sanction for spolitation of evidence does not address discovery non-compliance
【24h】

Partners say 'adverse inference' sanction for spolitation of evidence does not address discovery non-compliance

机译:合作伙伴表示,对证据的“不利推论”制裁不能解决发现不合规的问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Seeking reconsideration, the Valmont partners survivors moved on July 28 for default judgment rather than simply imposing adverse inference as a sanction on defendants' "willful spoliation of evidence" in support of their claims including the alleged fraudulent transfer of assets to avoid payment of environmental costs for cleanup at the Valmont Industrial Park in Hazleton. (See related article on P. 4 of this issue.)
机译:为寻求重新考虑,瓦尔蒙特合伙人幸存者于7月28日提出违约判决,而不是对支持被告“蓄意藏匿证据”的行为施加不利推论,以支持其主张,包括涉嫌欺诈性转移资产以避免支付环境成本在Hazleton的Valmont工业园区进行清理。 (请参阅本期第4页的相关文章。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号