首页> 外文期刊>Pennsylvania journal of environmental litigation >Trinity Industries says deposition corrections are justified;Greenlease insists parties do not get testimony 'do overs'
【24h】

Trinity Industries says deposition corrections are justified;Greenlease insists parties do not get testimony 'do overs'

机译:Trinity Industries表示纠正沉积是有道理的; Greenlease坚持要求当事方不作证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Trinity Industries Inc. contended on July 1 that there is no basis to strike its deposition corrections in an errata sheet because the issue at this point is defendant Greenlease Holding Co.'s fault, not its liability, with respect to CERCLA and Pennsylvania Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act claims stemming from contamination at the North Plant in Greenville. The case is in federal court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. (See issue of June 15,2011 P. 13.) Greenlease sold the property to Trinity Industries by way of a purchase agreement on Dec. 9,1986. Greenlease's predecessor, Greenville Steel Car Co., installed or used products and chemicals that allegedly included hazardous substances.
机译:Trinity Industries Inc.在7月1日争辩说,没有依据在勘误表中进行沉积校正,因为此时的问题是被告Greenlease Holding Co.对CERCLA和宾夕法尼亚州危险场所的过错,而不是其责任。 《清洁法》声称源于格林维尔北部工厂的污染。该案在宾夕法尼亚州西部地区的联邦法院审理。 (请参阅2011年6月15日,第13页。)Greenlease于1986年12月9日通过购买协议将该物业出售给了Trinity Industries。 Greenlease的前身Greenville Steel Car Co.安装或使用了据称包括有害物质的产品和化学品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号