首页> 外文期刊>Pattern recognition letters >Comparative analysis of image classification algorithms based on traditional machine learning and deep learning
【24h】

Comparative analysis of image classification algorithms based on traditional machine learning and deep learning

机译:基于传统机器学习和深度学习的图像分类算法的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Image classification is a hot research topic in today's society and an important direction in the field of image processing research. SVM is a very powerful classification model in machine learning. CNN is a type of feedforward neural network that includes convolution calculation and has a deep structure. It is one of the representative algorithms of deep learning. Taking SVM and CNN as examples, this paper compares and analyzes the traditional machine learning and deep learning image classification algorithms. This study found that when using a large sample mnist dataset, the accuracy of SVM is 0.88 and the accuracy of CNN is 0.98; when using a small sample COREL1000 dataset, the accuracy of SVM is 0.86 and the accuracy of CNN is 0.83. The experimental results in this paper show that traditional machine learning has a better solution effect on small sample data sets, and deep learning framework has higher recognition accuracy on large sample data sets. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:图像分类是当今社会中的热门研究课题,以及图像处理研究领域的重要方向。 SVM是机器学习中一个非常强大的分类模型。 CNN是一种馈电神经网络的一种类型,包括卷积计算并具有深度结构。它是深度学习的代表性算法之一。采用SVM和CNN作为示例,本文比较和分析了传统的机器学习和深度学习图像分类算法。本研究发现,当使用大型样品MNIST数据集时,SVM的精度为0.88,CNN的精度为0.98;使用小样本COREL1000数据集时,SVM的精度为0.86,CNN的精度为0.83。本文的实验结果表明,传统的机器学习对小型样本数据集具有更好的解决方案影响,深度学习框架在大型样本数据集上具有更高的识别准确性。 (c)2020由elsevier b.v发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号