首页> 外文期刊>Parliamentary Affairs >Managing the Poor Bloody Infantry: The Parliamentary Labour Party under John Smith, 1992–94
【24h】

Managing the Poor Bloody Infantry: The Parliamentary Labour Party under John Smith, 1992–94

机译:处理可怜的血腥步兵:约翰·史密斯(John Smith)领导的工党,1992–94年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contrary to commonly held perceptions, the PLP minutes from 1992 to 1994 are far from anodyne, and offer a real insight into the issues that divided the PLP, and how the Labour leadership under John Smith sought to deal with them. Also drawing on interview evidence from key members of Smith’s office and frontbench team, the author reveals that the main focus for debate inside the PLP was over the passage of the European Communities (Amendment) Bill, more commonly known as the Maastricht Bill. Labour MPs vigorously debated the issues in the bill, and held formal votes on two key parts (a rare occurrence in the PLP’s history). Other issues hotly debated occurred over Bosnia, electoral reform and whether or not to increase the quota for the number of women in the Shadow Cabinet. Under Smith, and in contrast to both Neil Kinnock and Tony Blair, a more tolerant and inclusive leadership style was operated.
机译:与通常的看法相反,1992年至1994年的PLP会议纪要远非止痛药,它对PLP的分歧以及约翰·史密斯(John Smith)领导下的工党如何寻求解决这些问题提供了真正的见识。笔者还利用史密斯办公室和前台工作人员的主要成员的采访证据,揭示了PLP内部辩论的主要焦点在于《欧洲共同体(修订)条例草案》的通过,该条例通常被称为《马斯特里赫特条例草案》。工党议员对法案中的问题进行了激烈辩论,并对两个关键部分进行了正式投票(这在PLP历史上是罕见的)。波斯尼亚,选举改革以及是否增加影子内阁中妇女人数的配额等引起了激烈辩论的其他问题。在史密斯(Smith)的领导下,与尼尔·金诺克(Neil Kinnock)和托尼·布莱尔(Tony Blair)形成鲜明对比的是,他们实行了宽容和包容的领导风格。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Parliamentary Affairs》 |2006年第3期|401-419|共19页
  • 作者

    Mark Stuart;

  • 作者单位

    Research Assitant at the University of Nottingham and an Associate Researcher at the Centre for Legislative Studies at the University of Hull;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号