...
首页> 外文期刊>Parliamentary Affairs >e-Petitions at Westminster: the Way Forward for Democracy?
【24h】

e-Petitions at Westminster: the Way Forward for Democracy?

机译:威斯敏斯特的电子申诉:民主的未来之路?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Westminster Parliament has been prompted to develop an e-Petitions system in light of the fact that similar tools are now well established in the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly. The Number Ten e-Petitions site, too, has proved inspirational although discussions within Westminster about the development of a comparable system have focused on the risks associated with it. This paper describes the momentum towards a Westminster-based e-Petitions system, highlighting the dilemmas that have emerged during discussions about the form it should take: should Westminster try to replicate the popular style of the Number Ten website and risk inundation with Parliamentary graffiti? Or would it be better to develop a system that ties in with Parliamentary processes—and do these processes themselves need to change? We discuss the move towards e-Petitions in the context of broader debates about e-Democracy and its role in revitalising political engagement.
机译:鉴于目前在苏格兰议会和威尔士议会中已经建立了类似的工具,威斯敏斯特议会被提示开发电子请愿系统。尽管威斯敏斯特内部有关可比系统开发的讨论都集中在与之相关的风险上,但十大电子信访网站也被证明是鼓舞人心的。本文描述了建立基于威斯敏斯特的电子请愿系统的势头,强调了在讨论其应采取的形式时出现的两难境地:威斯敏斯特是否应尝试复制十号网站的流行风格,并冒着被国会涂鸦淹没的风险?还是开发一个与国会程序联系在一起的系统会更好—这些程序本身是否需要改变?我们将在有关电子民主及其在振兴政治参与中的作用的更广泛辩论的背景下,讨论向电子竞争的转变。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Parliamentary Affairs》 |2009年第1期|p.162-177|共16页
  • 作者

    Laura Miller1;

  • 作者单位

    Hansard Society;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号