...
首页> 外文期刊>Pacific-Basin Finance Journal >Privatization effect versus listing effect: Evidence from China
【24h】

Privatization effect versus listing effect: Evidence from China

机译:私有化效应与上市效应:来自中国的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Previous studies show that profitability does not improve after share issue privatization (SIP) in China. We explore the possibility that the positive privatization effect can be overwhelmed by a negative listing effect, leading to an overall negative or insignificant SIP profitability change. Using the difference-in-differences approach with various matched samples, we show that there is a positive privatization effect and there is a negative listing effect on profitability. We also document evidence of a significant improvement in profitability after separating the "pure" privatization effect from the SIP effect. Our findings are robust to alternative variable specifications and methodological changes.
机译:先前的研究表明,中国股票发行私有化(SIP)后盈利能力并未提高。我们探讨了负面的上市效应可能会抵消正面的私有化效应,从而导致总体SIP负面或微不足道的利润变化。使用差异匹配方法和各种匹配的样本,我们发现私有化具有积极的作用,而上市公司则对盈利产生不利的影响。我们还记录了“纯”私有化效应与SIP效应分离后,获利能力显着改善的证据。我们的发现对替代性的可变规格和方法变更具有鲁棒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号