...
首页> 外文期刊>Pacific Affairs >To Join or Not to Join? State Ownership, Commercial Interests, and China's Belt and Road Initiative
【24h】

To Join or Not to Join? State Ownership, Commercial Interests, and China's Belt and Road Initiative

机译:要加入还是不加入?国家所有权,商业利益与中国的``一带一路''倡议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is often regarded as a vehicle of China's economic statecraft in that country's endeavour to expand its geopolitical influence overseas through investments and trade. In today's globalized world, however, the vast majority of international economic interactions are conducted by firms, not states. The success of the BRI therefore depends on whether and how China can compel its firms to behave in a way that serves the strategic interests of the state. Using a unique firm-level survey, we find that Chinese firms' interests in the BRI do not necessarily align with those of the state. Despite similar perceived risks and challenges to participation in the BRI among private and state-owned firms in China, state-owned enterprises are much more likely than private ones to express a willingness to participate in the BRI. These findings highlight the importance of state control in the exercise of economic statecraft.
机译:“一带一路”倡议(BRI)通常被视为中国经济治国之道,因为该国致力于通过投资和贸易将其地缘政治影响力扩大到海外。但是,在当今全球化的世界中,绝大多数国际经济互动是由公司而非国家进行的。因此,“一带一路”倡议的成功取决于中国是否以及如何迫使其公司以符合国家战略利益的方式行事。通过一次独特的企业级调查,我们发现中国企业在“一带一路”倡议中的利益不一定与国家利益保持一致。尽管中国的私营和国有企业在参与“一带一路”方面存在类似的风险和挑战,但与私有企业相比,国有企业更有可能表达参与“一带一路”的意愿。这些发现凸显了国家控制在实施经济治国方略中的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号