首页> 外文期刊>Pacific Accounting Review >Is there a “business case” for board diversity?
【24h】

Is there a “business case” for board diversity?

机译:是否存在董事会多元化的“商业案例”?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between board diversity, as represented by the percentage of female, minority or female and minority directors on the boards of directors, and firm financial performance, and to explore the potential determinants of board diversity, using data from the Australian corporate sector. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses the top 500 Australian companies as the initial data-set. Firm performance measures include return on assets, return on equity and shareholder return. Several control variables are introduced in the regression analysis. Findings – The results indicate that gender and racial diversity do not have significant influence on performance. It is reported that larger firms tend to have relatively more female members, and smaller firms or firms with larger boards may have more minority directors. Research limitations/implications – The findings should not be extrapolated to all firms as the sample is restricted to listed companies. To examine the complete impact of board diversity future research could consider non-financial performance indicators. Practical implications – The analysis shows that greater diversity does not lead to poor performance, which suggests that gender and racial diversity could be achieved without a negative effect on shareholder wealth. Originality/value – In addition to giving improved evidence on the effect of gender diversity on performance, the paper may be the first study which ascertains whether there is a “business case” for greater minority participation in boardrooms in the Australian context.
机译:目的–本文的目的是调查以女性,少数派或女性​​和少数派董事在董事会中所占百分比代表的董事会多元化与公司财务绩效之间的关系,并探讨董事会多元化的潜在决定因素,使用来自澳大利亚公司部门的数据。设计/方法/方法-本文使用澳大利亚500强公司作为初始数据集。公司绩效指标包括资产回报率,股本回报率和股东回报率。回归分析中引入了几个控制变量。调查结果–结果表明性别和种族多样性对绩效没有重大影响。据报道,较大的公司往往有相对更多的女性成员,较小的公司或具有较大董事会的公司可能拥有更多的少数派董事。研究的局限性/意义–由于样本仅限于上市公司,因此不应将调查结果外推到所有公司。为了检查董事会多元化的完整影响,未来的研究可以考虑非财务绩效指标。实际意义–分析表明,更大程度的多样性并不会导致业绩不佳,这表明可以实现性别和种族多样性,而不会对股东财富造成负面影响。原创性/价值–除了提供更好的证据证明性别多样性对绩效的影响外,该论文可能是第一项研究,确定在澳大利亚背景下是否存在“更多的商业案例”以促使少数群体更多地参与董事会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号