首页> 外文期刊>Oryx >Community perception of the real impacts of human-wildlife conflict in Laikipia, Kenya: capturing the relative significance of high-frequency, low-severity events
【24h】

Community perception of the real impacts of human-wildlife conflict in Laikipia, Kenya: capturing the relative significance of high-frequency, low-severity events

机译:社区对肯尼亚莱基皮亚人与野生动物冲突的实际影响的认识:捕捉高频率,低严重性事件的相对重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Biodiversity conservation outside protected areas requires cooperation from affected communities, hence the extensive discussions of trade-offs in conservation, and of a so-called new conservation that addresses human relations with nature more fully. Human-wildlife conflict is one aspect of those relations, and as land use intensifies around protected areas the need to understand and manage its effects will only increase. Research on human-wildlife conflict often focuses on individual species but given that protecting wildlife requires protecting habitat, assessments of human-wildlife conflict should include subsidiary impacts that are associated with ecosystem conditions. Using a case study from Laikipia, Kenya, where conservation outside protected areas is critical, we analysed human-wildlife conflict from a household perspective, exploring the full range of impacts experienced by community members on Makurian Group Ranch. We addressed questions about four themes: (1) the relationship between experienced and reported human-wildlife conflict; (2) the results of a high-resolution assessment of experienced human-wildlife conflict; (3) the relative impact of high-frequency, low-severity conflict vs high-severity, low-frequency conflict; and (4) the effect of experienced conflict on receptivity to the conservation narrative. Our results show that high-frequency, low-severity conflict, which is often absent from reports and discussion in the literature, is a significant factor in shaping a community's perception of the cost-benefit ratio of conservation. Local, ongoing, high-resolution monitoring of human-wildlife conflict may facilitate more realistic and effective incorporation of the experienced impacts of human-wildlife conflict in conservation planning and management. Such monitoring could help to define locally appropriate tradeoffs in conservation and thereby improve conservation outcomes.
机译:保护区以外的生物多样性保护需要受影响社区的合作,因此,广泛讨论了保护方面的权衡问题,以及关于更全面地解决人与自然关系的所谓新保护问题的讨论。人与野生生物之间的冲突是这些关系的一方面,随着保护区周围土地使用的加剧,对理解和管理其影响的需求只会增加。关于人类与野生生物冲突的研究通常侧重于单个物种,但是鉴于保护野生生物需要保护栖息地,因此对人类与野生生物冲突的评估应包括与生态系统状况相关的次要影响。在肯尼亚莱基皮亚的案例研究中,保护区外的保护至关重要,我们从家庭角度分析了人类与野生动物之间的冲突,探索了社区成员对马库里安牧场的各种影响。我们讨论了有关四个主题的问题:(1)经历过的和报告的人与野生动物冲突之间的关系; (2)对经历的人与野生动物冲突进行高分辨率评估的结果; (3)高频,低严重性冲突与高频,低严重性冲突的相对影响; (4)经历的冲突对保守性叙述的接受度的影响。我们的结果表明,文献中的报告和讨论中经常不存在高频,低严重性的冲突,这是塑造社区对保护成本效益比的看法的重要因素。对人与野生生物冲突的本地,持续,高分辨率的监测可能有助于将人与野生生物冲突的经验影响更现实和有效地纳入保护规划和管理。这种监测可以帮助确定保护方面的当地适当权衡,从而改善保护成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号