首页> 外文期刊>Oryx >Why do models fail to assess properly the sustainability of duiker (Cephalophus spp.) hunting in Central Africa?
【24h】

Why do models fail to assess properly the sustainability of duiker (Cephalophus spp.) hunting in Central Africa?

机译:为什么模型无法正确评估中部非洲杜克(Cephalophus spp。)狩猎的可持续性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hunting of wildlife in Central Africa is largely considered to be unsustainable. Several studies indicate that most mammal species should already have disappeared from many Central African forests but markets continue to be supplied with bushmeat, with no sign of large scale extinction of the most common species. Most studies of the sustainability of duiker (Cephalophus spp.) hunting in Central Africa are based on the same index of hunting. We illustrate how uncertainty is accumulated in these estimations of sustainability. We show that the results obtained in different sites are not comparable because a variety of methods have been used to calculate the parameters of the model and each of the methods has different sources of error. For the assessment of maximum sustainable harvest for duikers, the studies reviewed differ mainly in the value chosen for the hypothetical adjustment factor, and the method used to calculate the rate of maximum population increase and to estimate duiker population densities. For the assessment of annual hunting offtake the studies differ mainly in the scale at which they were conducted (village or regional), and sampling and extrapolation methods. Without evaluation of accuracy and standardization of methods for the estimation of maximum sustainable harvest and annual offtake, conclusions regarding harvesting based on biological indices should be treated with extreme caution.
机译:人们普遍认为在中非地区狩猎野生生物是不可持续的。几项研究表明,大多数哺乳动物物种应该已经从许多中非森林中消失了,但是市场仍继续供应食用森林猎物,没有迹象表明大多数常见物种已经大规模灭绝。关于中部非洲杜克(Cephalophus spp。)狩猎可持续性的大多数研究都基于相同的狩猎指数。我们说明了在这些可持续性评估中不确定性是如何累积的。我们表明,在不同位置获得的结果不具有可比性,因为已使用多种方法来计算模型的参数,并且每种方法都有不同的误差来源。为了评估独木舟的最大可持续收成,所审查的研究主要不同之处在于为假设的调整因子选择的值以及用于计算最大种群增加率和估计独木舟人口密度的方法。在评估年度狩猎量方面,研究的主要不同之处在于其开展的规模(村庄或区域)以及抽样和外推方法。在没有评估准确性和标准化方法的基础上,估计最大可持续收成和年度采伐量时,应非常谨慎地对待基于生物学指标的收成结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号