首页> 外文期刊>Oryx >Participatory forest carbon assessment in south-eastern Tanzania: experiences, costs and implications for REDD plus initiatives
【24h】

Participatory forest carbon assessment in south-eastern Tanzania: experiences, costs and implications for REDD plus initiatives

机译:坦桑尼亚东南部的参与式森林碳评估:经验,成本和对REDD计划的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to determine the changes in forest carbon in three village forests in Tanzania during 2009-2012 using participatory forest carbon assessment, and to evaluate the capability of the local communities to undertake the assessment, and the costs involved. The results show that forest degradation is caused not only by disturbance as a result of anthropogenic activities; other causes include natural mortality of small trees as a result of canopy closure, and the attraction of wild animals to closed-canopy forests. Thus, mechanisms are required to compensate communities for carbon loss that is beyond their control. However, an increase in the abundance of elephants Loxodonta africana and other fauna should not be considered negatively by local communities and other stakeholders, and the importance of improved biodiversity in the context of carbon stocks should be emphasized by those promoting REDD+ (Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation). This case study also shows that the cost per ha of USD < 1 for participatory forest carbon assessment is less than that reported for Tanzania and elsewhere (USD 3-5); this is attributed to the large area of forest studied. However, the cost of data analysis and reporting in 2012 (USD 4,519) was significantly higher than the baseline cost (USD 1,793) established in 2009 because of the involvement of external experts.
机译:这项研究的目的是使用参与式森林碳评估方法确定2009-2012年坦桑尼亚三个村庄森林中森林碳的变化,并评估当地社区进行评估的能力以及所涉及的成本。结果表明,森林退化不仅是由于人为活动造成的干扰,而且还造成了森林退化。其他原因还包括:由于遮篷的关闭,小树的自然死亡;以及野生动物对遮篷的森林的吸引。因此,需要一种机制来补偿社区无法控制的碳损失。但是,当地社区和其他利益攸关方不应对大象非洲象非洲象和其他动物的数量增加表示消极的看法,而倡导REDD +(减少森林砍伐的排放量)的人应强调在碳储量的背景下改善生物多样性的重要性。和森林退化)。该案例研究还表明,参与性森林碳评估的每公顷成本低于1美元,低于坦桑尼亚和其他地区的报告(3-5美元);这归因于所研究的大片森林。但是,由于外部专家的参与,2012年的数据分析和报告费用(4,519美元)大大高于2009年确定的基准费用(1,793美元)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号