...
首页> 外文期刊>Optical Communications and Networking, IEEE/OSA Journal of >OpenFlow and GMPLS unified control planes: Testbed implementation and comparative study
【24h】

OpenFlow and GMPLS unified control planes: Testbed implementation and comparative study

机译:OpenFlow和GMPLS统一控制平面:测试平台实施和比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Finding an effective and simple unified control plane (UCP) for IP/dense wavelength division multiplexing multilayer optical networks is very important for network providers. Generalized multi-protocol label switching (GMPLS) has been in development for decades to control optical transport networks. However, it is extremely difficult to deploy in real operational products, as there is still much non-GMPLS-capable equipment. On the other hand, OpenFlow (OF), one of the most widely used software defined networking implementations, can be used as a UCP for packet and circuit switched networks [???Packet and circuit network convergence with OpenFlow,??? in OFC/ NFOEC, Mar. 2010]. In this paper, we propose and experimentally evaluate two solutions using OF to control both packet and optical networks (OpenFlow Messages Mapping and OpenFlow Extension). The overall feasibility of these solutions is assessed, and their performance is evaluated and compared with the GMPLS approach, using a custom-built simulator. Simulation results show that the Open-Flow Extension solution outperforms the OpenFlow Messages Mapping and GMPLS solutions.
机译:对于IP /密集波分复用多层光网络,找到有效而简单的统一控制平面(UCP)对于网络提供商来说非常重要。通用多协议标签交换(GMPLS)已经发展了数十年,以控制光传输网络。但是,由于仍然存在许多不支持GMPLS的设备,因此很难在实际的操作产品中进行部署。另一方面,OpenFlow(OF)是使用最广泛的软件定义的网络实现之一,可以用作分组和电路交换网络的UCP [分组和电路网络与OpenFlow的融合,?于OFC / NFOEC,2010年3月]。在本文中,我们提出并实验评估了使用OF控制分组和光网络的两种解决方案(OpenFlow消息映射和OpenFlow扩展)。使用定制的模拟器评估了这些解决方案的整体可行性,并评估了它们的性能并与GMPLS方法进行了比较。仿真结果表明,Open-Flow Extension解决方案的性能优于OpenFlow消息映射和GMPLS解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号